🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the tension sparked by the introduction of a new 28-article proposal for ending the war appeared – temporarily – to have been contained. A American diplomat spoke of "substantial progress" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its retaliation: a renewed assault of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Negotiation and Warfare

The chain of contrasting events captured the harsh reality of the current period. By day, negotiation efforts are conducted: optimistic declarations are released from different nations. Significant resources is allocated on containing particular approaches. By night, Russian leadership clearly shows the world that, for them, war remains the primary tool for achieving "settlement".

After-Dark Attacks

As the offensive unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the immediate reality of Ukraine's defenselessness was revealed. Ukraine is capable of detecting missile launches from across the border, a capacity provided through up-to-date information. From vantage locations, defense planes that had been dispatched to engage hostile cruise missiles streaked across the sky – sophisticated military planes provided to Ukraine by Western partners.

Moments later, Kyiv's missile defense thundered: defensive missiles deployed against a Russian ballistic missile. This was a modern interception technology at work, probably delivered by allied countries. Every launch shakes the surroundings, causing tremors. The instant of fear quickly becomes grim resignation: maybe the incoming missile won't strike its target this time, preventing destruction from devastation and another blackout.

Continuous Dangers

Soon after, a automatic firearm opened up on a unmanned aircraft in the vicinity, part of a rapid response unit – probably Western-made equipment. Regrettably, the shots failed to hit the hostile drone – it continued its flight toward its target.

Periodically, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the early updates: multiple fatalities, devastation and utility failures in numerous residences as a result of the evening attack. As always, everyone still maintained normal activities – living the war. But those entire period demonstrated Ukraine's essential dependence on Western support – a need that regional partners are evidently unprepared to fill in the short term.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The 28-point plan from Washington provoked deep reactions, discussion and deep concern – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after earlier high-level meetings and international summits.

Every new proposal from US leadership follows the consistent cycle: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, succeeds in resisting. They stabilise the situation but never actually secure success. This pattern will, no doubt, endure.

Political Considerations

It is easy to blame particular leaders of repeatedly advocating Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the whole story. Washington operates on a assumption well known to international relations experts: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have been unable to protect through force. The White House presumes that it is unfeasible to force Russia to abandon the areas that it presently holds in Ukraine's south or east.

The issue is that while recognising this factual reality, American administration does little to discourage Russia, through words or deeds, from thinking that the situation will not shift further in its advantage in the months ahead.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, Moscow is convinced that duration works to their advantage – that Ukraine and its allies are nearing depletion. Their incentive to agree to terms that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is close to zero. There may be multiple initiatives to end hostilities, but they will continue as long as Russia's leadership remains completely certain in the outcome.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still hold out, progressively conceding civilians and areas but averting a total frontline collapse until circumstances change in its favour.

Existing Situation

Objectively, there are no genuine requirements for a ceasefire. Now, individual motivations are entering the equation: personal goals to broker a ceasefire and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and the government's twin challenges – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to unite the population around the flag against any plan Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their attention does not move to homefront challenges. And although their objective will now be considerably more difficult after recent developments, it remains highly unlikely that this will alter their fundamental strategy.

These opposing factors are driving the talks.

Summary and Prospects

It took a mere seven days to kill the proposed articles of the latest plan. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by American leadership, opposition by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with calming attempts of diplomats, and finally, latest revelations, all did their job.

While new plans based on previous concepts are imminent, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter negotiation assaults from Washington that are rooted in Kremlin requirements and demonstrate specific hesitation to modify developments, if they stand together and improve their protective measures at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the foreseeable future, largely rely on continued Western support.